Mumbai Police

There’s a phrase often used in the context of cinema: suspension of disbelief. It is applied as much to the films of David Dhawan as to the slick, expensively-mounted, action-packed star vehicles that inundate the multiplexes every summer. With the former, it is used as an excuse — leave your brains behind and enjoy the film, yaar. With the latter, it is used as advertisement — when Bruce Willis shoots a helicopter with a car (yes, you read that right, a car), we find ourselves enjoying the ride, and the point of all that finely-timed action choreography is to make us not care, for those ninety-odd minutes, how absurd it all is. At a very meta level, it applies to all of cinema, but let’s not go there now.

The concept applies to quiet thrillers too, in that crucial developments often hinge on things happening exactly so. Except here, the pace gives your mind a bit of time to wander, and that can break the spell. So how do you get your audience to stay with you? By making them care, not about what happens, but about who it happens to, that’s how.

A police officer calls his colleague to inform him that he has solved a murder, and meets with an accident while he is talking. He wakes up with complete amnesia. His colleague asks him to re-solve the case, while not letting anyone else know of his condition. In an abstract sense, it is an interesting premise, but it doesn’t take much to count the myriad ways in which this could go wrong.

Why, then, does Mumbai Police work so well?

The answer, I think, lies in two things. The first is the quality of the performances. Jayasurya’s character (he plays the murdered cop) is the least complicated of the lot, and he does it justice. Rahman’s top cop is not an easy character to play — opaque and transparent at the same time, in ways we don’t completely understand at first. He knocks it out of the park.

Prithviraj gets the toughie — his Inspector Moses is more layered than the average onion, and his ability to draw us into his journey and make us care is what makes the film work, even in those patches where the plot is barely plausible.

The second is the quality of the writing, especially narrative style which seamlessly interweaves the happenings prior to the accident and those after. Apart from getting the protagonist up to date with what he has forgotten, it also subtly ensures that we are a little less disoriented than he is. And yet, it’s a complex whodunit.

At one level, this is a procedural. But look closely, and you realize that it is actually three procedurals wrapped into one: how the case was solved the first time around, how it was solved the second time around, and an examination of why the first investigation proceeded the way it did. Add to this the personal torment of a man searching for himself with only scant clues as to who he used to be, and a few others with their own baggage to carry. All of these threads hinge on one crucial revelation.

Stephen King speaks of stories that hinge on the plot (where the characters behave as the plot needs them to, and hopefully remain consistent in the process), and ones that hinge on the characters (where the plot is simply the result of a set of characters thrown into a certain situation).

Here’s the utterly amazing thing about Mumbai Police: despite having so much plot to handle, it manages to fall into the second category. Exactly how often does that happen in the movies?



9 thoughts on “Mumbai Police

  1. Banno says:

    I wish they would release these films with subtitles. They do release regional language films at PVR, but hey, no subtitles. Don’t understand the logic.

    • Anonymous says:

      Obviously the assumption is that the nearly everyone who wants to watch films in a regional language knows the language already. The trouble is, it more or less ensures that very few of the wonderful regional films get the widespread acclaim they deserve. The ones everyone ends up hearing about are of the Rowdy Rathore variety, when they get remade. Pity.

  2. S says:

    “when Bruce Willis shoots a helicopter with a car (yes, you read that right, a car)” — I knew it! This is where Maghadheera lifts its “shoot helicopter with a jeep” sequence from. Thank you Ramsu. I can rest easy now.

    But seriously, nice review. I’ll keep an eye out for Mumbai Police.

  3. Have a look on this Clip from the Play “Shaheed Bhagat Singh”

    Actors in this Scene :

    Vijay Badlani As Chandra Shekahar azaad
    Lokesh Nalwa As Bhagat Singh
    Lokesh G. As Bismil
    Anand Jaiswal as Ashfaqulla Khan

  4. S says:

    What you say here really resonates, especially para 2, about quiet thrillers…making the audience care. Also the thing that King says about character and how that applies to Mumbai Police. I haven’t seen it yet but re-reading this now, I really want to.

  5. S says:

    Finally watched this last night. Couldn’t agree more with all that you’ve written about how it was handled, how everything unfolded. I’m not into fortune telling but was highly intrigued by the “pal mystery” in it. One thing I found hard to stomach was that “cutie” who flew to Qatar angle… felt shoe horned in. But in light of the film’s overall edge of the seat effectiveness, all else paled.

    PS. Same can be said about Papanasam that we just saw, to sign off a “procedural” weekend. (A class act coz of Kamal surrendering to the script/director.)
    PPS. Neither topped Bhajrangi Bhaijaan I saw earlier in the day, but then I may be “bhai”ased coz it’s Aug 15. 🙂

      • S says:

        I know it’s the same person, but that wasn’t my point. I was trying to verbalize (without slipping up SPOILERS) my overall disappointment at how the protagonist’s relationship with the Qatar flier was handled. It felt shoe-horned in. It wasn’t very believable (to me) as the fulcrum on which the entire plot turned. For a film that explored its friendships so fully, thataspect (and its quick-and-dirty-ness) left a whole lot to be desired.

      • You make a good point. The structure is impeccable, but the actual crime and its motivation is less than impeccably handled. The only reason why it doesn’t torpedo the film is the fact that, by the time it comes up, you’re already invested in the character. Also, the last scene is so powerful that you walk out willing to forgive it a while litany of sins.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s